<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The American Guesser &#187; Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com/tag/free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com</link>
	<description>A River City perspective on third parties and free &#38; fair elections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Goodbye Fairness Doctrine, hello Fairness Doctrine by proxy</title>
		<link>http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com/2008/11/26/goodbye-fairness-doctrine-hello-fairness-doctrine-by-proxy/</link>
		<comments>http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com/2008/11/26/goodbye-fairness-doctrine-hello-fairness-doctrine-by-proxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ol' Uncle Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters has an interesting story about powerful senators who really, really, really want to see the Fairness Doctrine come back. And yes, people, the article does state that President-elect Obama is on record as opposing a Fairness Doctrine comeback.
Several points:
He has not stated that he would veto a new Fairness Doctrine.
He might be willing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuters has an interesting story about <a href="http://fe13.story.media.ac4.yahoo.com/news/us/story/nm/20081126/tv_nm/us_fairness?fark">powerful senators who really, really, really want to see the Fairness Doctrine come back</a>. And yes, people, the article does state that President-elect Obama is on record as opposing a Fairness Doctrine comeback.</p>
<p>Several points:</p>
<p>He has not stated that he would veto a new Fairness Doctrine.</p>
<p>He might be willing to trade his opposition to the Fairness Doctrine for something else, or simply might not be opposed enough to fight to keep it from becoming law if it&#8217;s attached to another bill.</p>
<p>And as the article points out, there are other ways to skin a cat:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama has called on Henry Rivera, who was a commissioner in the 1980s when the Fairness Doctrine existed, to oversee the FCC transition process. Rivera is a supporter of bringing back the provisions. And heading Obama&#8217;s overall transition team is <span class="yshortcuts">John Podesta</span>, head of liberal think tank the Center for American Progress. Last year, the CAP issued a report called &#8220;The Structural Imbalance of Political <span class="yshortcuts">Talk Radio</span>.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the CAP stopped short of advocating a return of the Fairness Doctrine, it did support more stringent adherence to so-called localism, which critics consider a back door to requiring that stations ditch some of their conservative hosts.</p>
<p>The <span class="yshortcuts">FCC</span> is considering the matter now, weighing such questions as whether to require stations to create &#8220;community advisory boards&#8221; made up of &#8220;local officials and other community leaders.&#8221; The boards would tell radio executives whether the content they broadcast is adequately addressing the needs of the community, subject to the board&#8217;s interpretation.</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, Obama isn&#8217;t going to demand that stations like <a href="http://1470wmbd.com">WMBD1470</a> gut their profitable programing by requiring the station to hand over free air time to anyone who disagrees with an opinion Rush Limbaugh states.</p>
<p>No, what Obama and his minions on the FCC are going to require that the station &#8212; ALL stations &#8212; let volunteers from the community decide what programing to air.</p>
<p>In other words, fairness and equity will be mandatory.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another idea: Just demand that the FCC finally free up those low-power FM licenses that they&#8217;ve kept on hold at the behest of Big Media for years. Let these new license holders &#8212; presumably members of the local community &#8212; compete in the free marketplaces of both commerce and ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://americanguesser.blogpeoria.com/2008/11/26/goodbye-fairness-doctrine-hello-fairness-doctrine-by-proxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
